Here are my responses to the 2020 PhilPapers Survey:
A priori knowledge: no
Abortion (first trimester): permissible
Abstract objects: nominalism
Aesthetic experience: sui generis (appreciating something for its own sake)
Aesthetic value: subjective
Aim of philosophy: understanding, truth/knowledge
Analysis of knowledge: other analysis (S believes that p for the reason that p)
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes
Arguments for theism: none
Belief or credence: credence
Capital punishment: impermissible
Causation: counterfactual/difference-making
Chinese room: doesn’t understand
Concepts: empiricism
Consciousness: dualism
Eating animals and animal products: omnivorism
Environmental ethics: non-anthropocentric
Epistemic justification: internalism
Experience machine: no
Extended mind: no
External world: non-sceptical realism
Footbridge: don’t push
Free will: compatibilism
Gender categories: revise
Gender: psychological
God: atheism
Grounds of intentionality: primitive
Hard problem of consciousness: yes
Hume (what is his view?): sceptic
Immortality: no
Justification: non-reliabilist foundationalism
Kant (what is his view?): one world (two-aspect view)
Knowledge claims: invariantism
Knowledge: empiricism
Law: legal positivism
Laws of nature: Humean
Logic: classical
Meaning of life: subjective
Mental content: externalism
Meta-ethics: moral anti-realism
Method in history of philosophy: analytic/rational reconstruction
Method in political philosophy: ideal theory
Mind uploading: survival
Mind: non-physicalism
Moral judgement: cognitivism